4.6 Article

Reaction Heterogeneity in LiFePO4Agglomerates and the Role of Intercalation-Induced Stress

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 1648-1656

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00226

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0019111]
  2. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1929949]
  3. U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC0298CH10886]
  4. U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  5. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, three-dimensional X-ray spectroscopic imaging was used to investigate the reaction distribution in lithium iron phosphate secondary particles. It was found that the reaction distribution morphology is different from the commonly assumed core-shell structure, and is influenced by the elastic interaction between particles, resulting in enhanced reaction heterogeneity.
As an important battery cathode material, reaction distribution inlithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) has been extensively studied in dispersedparticle systems, but remains poorly understood for mesoscopic agglomerates (orsecondary particles) that are used in most commercial batteries. Herein, we applythree-dimensional X-ray spectroscopic imaging to characterize the two-phasestructure in LiFePO4secondary particles during electrochemical cycling.(De)lithiated domains are found to not form the commonly assumed core-shell structure but develop highly anisotropicfilamentary morphology that is rateindependent and symmetric between charging and discharging. Phase-fieldsimulations elucidate that the observed 1D phase growth behavior is not causedby the 1D lithium diffusivity of LiFePO4but the elastic interaction between primary particles, which gives rise to strongerreaction heterogeneity than dispersed nanoparticles. As a result, uniform lithium (de)intercalation does not occur on thesecondary particle surface even at high cycling rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据