4.5 Article

Exosomal circSHKBP1 participates in non-small cell lung cancer progression through PKM2-mediated glycolysis

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY-ONCOLYTICS
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 470-485

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omto.2022.01.012

关键词

-

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Foundation [2021M703372]
  2. Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund of Guangdong Province [2021A1515110967]
  3. Construction Fund of Key Medical Subject in Longhua District, Shenzhen City
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82003172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the biological function of circSHKBP1 in NSCLC and found that it enhanced proliferation, migration, invasion, and stemness of NSCLC cells. The study also identified the miR-1294/PKM2 axis as the mechanism by which circSHKBP1 regulates NSCLC progression. These findings suggest that circSHKBP1 may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for NSCLC.
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a high morbidity and mortality, and it is imperative to explore the latent pathogenesis mechanism of NSCLC progression to find potential prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. The present study aimed to explore the biological function of circSHKBP1 in NSCLC. circSHKBP1 was found to be upregulated in NSCLC tissues and cell lines and was enriched in exosomes derived from NSCLC cells. Exosomal circSHKBP1 enhanced the proliferation, migration, invasion, and stemness of NSCLC cells. miRNA-1294 was identified as a target for circSHKBP1, and circSHKBP1 upregulated PKM2 expression by sponging miR-1294. Exosomal circSHKBP1 regulated glycolysis through PKM2 in a HIF-1 alpha-dependent manner in NSCLC cells and promoted M2 polarization and macrophage recruitment. Moreover, exosomal circSHKBP1 promoted NSCLC cell growth, metastasis, and M2 infiltration in vivo. Thus, exosomal circSHKBP1 participated in the progression of NSCLC via the miR-1294/PKM2 axis. circSHKBP1 may be potential biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据