4.5 Article

Oncolytic Zika virus promotes intratumoral T cell infiltration and improves immunotherapy efficacy in glioblastoma

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY-ONCOLYTICS
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 522-534

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omto.2022.01.011

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2018ZX09711003]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0 505602]
  3. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences [2016-I2M-1-005, 2019-I2M-5-049]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [3200129, 31770190, U1702282, 81872408, 31900472]
  5. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [81925025]
  6. NSFC [81621005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zika virus treatment can enhance immune cell infiltration and activation in glioblastoma and inhibit tumor growth. Additionally, Zika virus can activate the interferon signaling pathway in glioblastoma cells. This therapy can improve the sensitivity of glioblastoma to immune checkpoint blockade.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the deadliest primary brain tumor and is generally resistant to immunotherapy because of severe dysfunction of T cells. Novel treatment options are critically needed to overcome the immunotherapy resistance of GBM. Here we demonstrate that Zika virus (ZIKV) treatment improves the efficacy of anti-PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy in GBM. We found that ZIKV induces a strong pro-inflammatory response and increases CD4+ and CD8+ T cell intratumoral infiltration and activation in GBM mouse models. ZIKV treatment of mice bearing GBM tumors inhibits tumor growth and prolongs survival. These therapeutic effects of ZIKV on GBM tumors are negated in mice depleted of T cells. Moreover, ZIKV dramatically promotes activation of the type I interferon signaling pathway in GBM cells. ZIKV treatment potently sensitizes GBM to PD-L1 blockade and provides significant ZIKV overcomes the resistance of GBM to immune checkpoint blockade, which may lead to therapeutic applications therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据