4.7 Article

Generation of optimal (de)centralized layouts for urban drainage systems: A graph-theory-based combinatorial multi-objective optimization framework

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103827

关键词

Urban drainage networks; Graph theory; Layout decentralization; Resilience; Optimization

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 31104-N29]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent research has shown the suitability and effectiveness of decentralized paradigms in the field of underground conveyance drainage infrastructures for addressing sustainability and resilience demands. A scheme is proposed in this study to create and optimize decentralization scenarios for sewer layout configurations, reducing design construction costs and improving network resilience.
The suitability and effectiveness of decentralized paradigms in the field of underground conveyance drainage infrastructures for coping with the current and upcoming sustainability and resilience demands has been documented in recent research. However, a generic and holistic framework that can be quickly put in practice is lacking. To this end, this study proposes a scheme for creating and optimizing decentralization scenarios in terms of sewer layout configurations for both flat and steep terrains with the aid of a combinatorial graph-theory-based optimization. Additionally, a novel and generalized formula is derived to determine the degree of centralization coupled with three layout objective functions, thereby eliminating several feasible layout solutions. The results indicate that cherry picking an appropriate sewer structure (topological layout) at the planning stage can largely influence the design construction costs (reduction up to 49% for steep terrain and 25% for flat terrain), as well as the resilience response of the final network. Therefore, as a general rule of thumb, breaking down the centralized network into a decentralized one can reduce construction cost and improve resilience.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据