4.7 Article

Failure consequence evaluation of uncontrollable district heating network

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103593

关键词

District heating network; Failure consequence assessment; Critical area identification; Graph theory; Information entropy; Safety economics

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2021YFE0116100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a model for evaluating the failure consequences of district heating networks and verifies its effectiveness. The failure consequences are most influenced by maintenance time, and reducing maintenance time can reduce property economic losses.
The control system of some existing district heating networks (DHNs) is not sufficient to handle urgent failure scenarios, which cannot make timely and effective responses within a short period after failures. The failure of this uncontrollable DHN will cause more severe consequences. To search critical areas for protection, this study proposed a failure consequence evaluation model. Then, the calculation model of each evaluation index was established based on graph theory, information entropy and safety economics considering topology, function, casualty and economy losses. Spearman correlation coefficient was applied to analyze the correlation of various evaluation indexes and we studied the applicability of each index. Finally, we simulated a single-heat-source DHN case for failure consequences. According to the simulation results, the critical isolation areas are effectively-identified, and the results indicate the applicability of the evaluation model. Moreover, the factors affecting the failure consequences were explored through sensitivity analysis. Among the three sensitive factors of maintenance time, unit price of electricity, water and heat, compensation coefficient, the maintenance time has the most significant influence on failure consequences. When the maintenance time reduces by 20%, the property economic loss in each isolation area reduces by 8.5-29.28%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据