4.5 Article

A novel long term solar photovoltaic power forecasting approach using LSTM with Nadam optimizer: A case study of India

期刊

ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 2909-2929

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ese3.1178

关键词

long short-term memory; Nadam; photovoltaic power forecasting; photovoltaic power plant; time series forecasting

资金

  1. Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology Bhopal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a new long-term solar PV power forecasting approach using the LSTM model with Nadam optimizer. The experimental results show a significant improvement in forecasting accuracy compared to other models.
Solar photovoltaic (PV) power is emerging as one of the most viable renewable energy sources. The recent enhancements in the integration of renewable energy sources into the power grid create a dire need for reliable solar power forecasting techniques. In this paper, a new long-term solar PV power forecasting approach using long short-term memory (LSTM) model with Nadam optimizer is presented. The LSTM model performs better with the time-series data as it persists information of more time steps. The experimental models are realized on a 250.25 kW installed capacity solar PV power system located at MANIT Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. The proposed model is compared with two time-series models and eight neural network models using LSTM with different optimizers. The obtained results using LSTM with Nadam optimizer present a significant improvement in the forecasting accuracy of 30.56% over autoregressive integrated moving average, 47.48% over seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average, and 1.35%, 1.43%, 3.51%, 4.88%, 11.84%, 50.69%, and 58.29% over models using RMSprop, Adam, Adamax, SGD, Adagrad, Adadelta, and Ftrl optimizer, respectively. The experimental results prove that the proposed methodology is more conclusive for solar PV power forecasting and can be employed for enhanced system planning and management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据