4.7 Article

Theoretical critical metastability temperature to interpret phase formation in a lamellar-like-structured high entropy alloy

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.104

关键词

High entropy alloys; Microstructure; Interfacial energy; Phase transformation

资金

  1. Malaysian of Higher Education (MoHE) [FRGS/1/2019/TK05/UIAM/03/3]
  2. IIUM (International Islamic University Malaysia) Fellowship Scheme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Control over a lamellar-like-structured high entropy alloy system can be achieved by replacing aluminum with boron. The addition of boron influences the microstructure and phase formation, and the presence of Fe2B phase correlates with interfacial energy.
Control over a lamellar-like-structured high entropy alloy (HEA) system is found to be possible by replacement of aluminium with boron into the FeCoNi(B-x Al1-x)0.1Si(0.1) compo-sition in the range of x 1/4 0 to 1.0. The BCC/B2 microstructure of FeCoNi(Al0.1Si0.1) HEA is changed into a multiple phase system comprising of BCC/B2, FCC and Fe2B-type inter-metallic phases. The microstructures of as-cast alloys were seen to be a lamellar-like structure comprised of nanostructured lamellae with alternating FCC and Fe2B phases. The concept of critical metastability temperature from nucleation theory is employed phenomenologically, and found to correlate with the presence of Fe2B in this alloy at different boron additions. With the substitution of boron, the stability of the disordered BCC solid solution is reduced, promoting the formation of secondary phases. We show a link between the interfacial energy of the phases present, the interlamellar spacing, and alloy metastability as a function of boron addition, the key relationship being that Fe2B phase formation correlates with a drastic reduction in the interfacial energy. These cor-relations bear further investigation and may be useful in the design of lamellar-like-structured multi-component systems.(C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.& nbsp;

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据