4.7 Article

Synthesis, characterization, and heavy-ion rejection rate efficiency of PVA/MWCNTs and Triton X-100/MWCNTs Buckypaper membranes

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.099

关键词

Heavy metal ion rejection; Multiwall carbon nanotubes; Triton X-100; PVA; Membrane

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at Jouf University [DSR-2021-03-0356]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Buckypaper membranes were prepared by dispersing multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in the presence of surfactants (Triton X-100) and (PVA). The incorporation of Triton X-100 and PVA surfactants improved the permeability and rejection efficiency of the MWCNTs. The membranes showed high rejection performance for heavy metal ions and potential applications.
Buckypaper membranes were prepared through the dispersion of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in the presence of surfactants (Triton X-100) and (PVA) in a separate manner. The dispersed solutions were vacuum filtered and Buckypapers, which are selfsupporting membranes were obtained. The results revealed that the incorporation of both Triton X-100 and PVA surfactants increased the permeability and rejection efficiency of the MWCNTs. The rejection performance for the heavy metal ions of both membranes is investigated for the first time. The physico-chemical and morphological characteristics of the membranes were reported. PVA and Triton X-100 BP membranes displayed electrical conductivity (32.749 +/- 2 S cm-1 and 58.3072 +/- 1 S cm-1), contact angle (58 +/- 3 degrees and 34 +/- 3 degrees), water permeability (20 +/- 2 Lm-2 h-1 bar-1 and 79 +/- 4 Lm-2 h-1 bar-1), surface area (67.7 and 88.5 m2/g) and mechanical properties (Young's module was found to be 10.25 +/- 0.2 and 6.07 +/- 0.7) respectively. Both PVA/MWCNTs BP and Trix-100/MWCNTs BP membranes dium. Furthermore, the rejection of metal ions was more efficient in PVA-based membranes compared to Trix-based membranes. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据