4.6 Review

Targeting the Salience Network: A Mini-Review on a Novel Neuromodulation Approach for Treating Alcohol Use Disorder

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.893833

关键词

alcohol use disorder; neuromodulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation; treatment; salience network; neurocircuitry

资金

  1. Department of Veteran's Affairs (VA), Veteran's Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Clinical Science Research and Development (CSR&D) Career Development Award [IK2 CX001356]
  2. Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention
  3. Sierra Pacific VISN 21 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is difficult to treat, and two-thirds of individuals relapse after treatment. Recent studies have found that modulating the salience network (SN) through neuromodulation approaches, particularly by stimulating the anterior insula or dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, may be an effective therapeutic strategy.
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) continues to be challenging to treat despite the best available interventions, with two-thirds of individuals going on to relapse by 1 year after treatment. Recent advances in the brain-based conceptual framework of addiction have allowed the field to pivot into a neuromodulation approach to intervention for these devastative disorders. Small trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have used protocols developed for other psychiatric conditions and applied them to those with addiction with modest efficacy. Recent evidence suggests that a TMS approach focused on modulating the salience network (SN), a circuit at the crossroads of large-scale networks associated with AUD, may be a fruitful therapeutic strategy. The anterior insula or dorsal anterior cingulate cortex may be particularly effective stimulation sites given emerging evidence of their roles in processes associated with relapse.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据