4.7 Article

ICA II Alleviates Testicular Torsion Injury by Dampening the Oxidative and Inflammatory Stress

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.871548

关键词

testicular torsion; icariside II; testosterone; fertility; oxidative stress; inflammatory stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic potential of Icariside II (ICA II) on testicular torsion. The results showed that ICA II alleviated testicular damage by mitigating spermatogenic cell injury and improving testosterone production.
Testicular torsion-detorsion is an ischaemia-reperfusion-induced male gonad injury that may lead to male infertility. Oxidative stress plays an important role in the ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Icariside II (ICA II) prevents oxidative stress and has obvious protective effects on spermatogenic function. The present study was aimed to investigate therapeutic potentials of ICA II on testicular torsion. 72 mice were randomly divided into three groups: sham-operated control group (n = 24), testicular ischemia-reperfusion + saline group (n = 24) and testicular ischemia-reperfusion + icariside II treated group (n = 24). Testicular ischemia-reperfusion was induced by the left testis rotated 360 degrees in a clockwise direction for 30 minutes followed by detorsion, the contralateral testis was removed. ICA II in saline (5 mg/kg/day) was administrated by gavage immediately after detorsion. The results demonstrated that ICA II alleviated testicular damage by mitigating spermatogenic cell injury and improving testosterone production in mouse models of testicular torsion. We revealed that ICA II alleviated oxidative stress and apoptosis in the testes, reduced inflammatory infiltration and accelerated angiogenesis. Briefly, ICA II administration ameliorated testicular damage by improving spermatogenic function and testosterone production, which supports its use as a pharmacological treatment of testicular torsion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据