4.5 Article

The High-Frequency Tidal Response of Ocean Worlds: Application to Europa and Ganymede

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021JE007064

关键词

tides; icy satellites; Europa; Ganymede; planetary interiors

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) through the Europa Clipper project
  2. NASA [80NSSC20K0570]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the tidal response model of Europa and Ganymede, considering ocean dynamics and the coupling effect with the ice shell. High-frequency tidal deformation is resonantly amplified by ocean dynamics, providing a unique determination of ocean thickness. This study is of great importance for understanding the thermal/orbital evolution of the moons.
Europa and Ganymede, whose liquid water oceans are of uncertain thickness, are subject to tidal forces across a broad frequency spectrum. Tidal deformation is inherently frequency dependent, an effect which is enhanced when a subsurface ocean is present. We model the tidal response of Europa and Ganymede, taking into account ocean dynamics and the viscoelastic coupling to the ice shell. Tidal deformation at high frequencies - a result of moon-moon interactions - is resonantly amplified by ocean dynamics. We find the corresponding tidal Love numbers to be extremely sensitive to ocean thickness and weakly sensitive to ice shell thickness, shear modulus, and viscosity. Measuring these high-frequency deformations would provide a unique determination of ocean thickness, though the minimum sensitivity required to detect the relevant deformation (0.1 mm, 2 nGal) makes this an extreme challenge. Detection of a large signal on the order of centimeters would only be possible if the ocean was tuned to a particular thickness, which would suggest that moon-moon tides play a role in the thermal/orbital evolution of the moon. Scaling laws are also derived that predict the resonant enhancement of tidal Love numbers and associated tidal dissipation in the ocean and ice shell.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据