4.6 Article

A Prognostic Signature for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on Ferroptosis-Related lncRNAs and Immune Checkpoints

期刊

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.912190

关键词

ccRCC; ferroptosis; lncRNA; immune checkpoints; prognosis signatures

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81971371, 82101671]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A risk model based on ccRCC patient data can effectively predict the prognosis of ccRCC patients and provide a new direction for clinical treatment. Ferroptosis-related lncRNAs have independent prognostic characteristics in ccRCC patients and are associated with oxygen metabolic processes and immune pathways.
Background: Ferroptosis is a potential target for cancer therapy, and lncRNAs can also affect ferroptosis by regulating related genes. The pathogenesis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) regarding the regulation of ferroptosis by lncRNAs is still unknown.Methods: We constructed a risk model based on data in ccRCC patients obtained from the TCGA database and validated the diagnostic and prognostic value of the model. In addition, immune function and immune checkpoint variability analysis validated the association of ferroptosis with ccRCC tumor immunity.Results: The characteristics of ferroptosis-related lncRNAs (FRLs) were significantly correlated with the prognosis of ccRCC patients. The prognostic characteristics of FRLs were independent prognostic factors in ccRCC patients. Gene function in the high-risk group was associated with oxygen metabolic processes and immune pathways. Immune checkpoint variability analysis showed that HAVCR2, NRP1, and HHLA2 were upregulated in the low-risk group, while CD44, TNFRSF18, TNFSF14, TNFRSF8, CD276, and TNFRSF25 were upregulated in the high-risk group.Conclusions: The prognostic characteristics of FRLs can effectively predict the prognosis of ccRCC patients and provide a new direction for clinical treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据