4.7 Article

Sound insulation effect of magnetorheological fluid as a function of magnetic field strength and direction

期刊

MATERIALS RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 310-317

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21663831.2022.2050431

关键词

Magnetorheological fluid (MR-F); sound transmission loss (STL); carbonyl iron powder (CIP); impedance tube; porous model

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1F1A1059167, 2020R1A4A30795 95]
  2. Korea Medical Device Development Fund [9991006803, KMDFPR_20200901_0130]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1F1A1059167] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a sound absorber using a magnetorheological fluid (MR-F) and investigated the effect of magnetic field strength and direction on sound transmission loss (STL). The results showed that by controlling the magnetic field conditions, the STL could be significantly increased, mainly due to the changes in density and alignment angle of the carbonyl iron powder (CIP).
IMPACT STATEMENT Sound transmission loss was significantly increased by sound insulation effect of a magnetorheological fluid as a function of magnetic field strength and direction. We developed a sound absorber using a magnetorheological fluid(MR-F) based on the density and alignment angle of carbonyl iron powder(CIP) chains by the controlling the magnetic field strength and direction. The magnetically arranged CIP lattice structure considerably influenced the sound transmission loss(STL). We used optical microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry, and X-ray diffraction to investigate the STL by varying the magnetic field strength from 0 to 40 mT and the angle from 0 to 30 degrees. The STL was markedly increased (133%) owing to an similar to 10-fold increased density and the CIP alignment. These results were verified using the developed MR-F porous model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据