4.7 Article Data Paper

Comprehensive RNA dataset of tissue and plasma from patients with esophageal cancer or precursor lesions

期刊

SCIENTIFIC DATA
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01176-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ghent University supercomputing infrastructure HPC
  2. Ghent University Special Research Fund (BOF)
  3. Concerted Research Action (BOF-GOA)
  4. Kom Op Tegen Kanker (Stand up to Cancer)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted comprehensive RNA analysis of samples from esophageal adenocarcinoma patients, providing a unique resource for studying biomarkers and disease mechanisms. The dataset allows for comparison of tissue and liquid biopsy profiles, integration of coding and non-coding RNA patterns, and can serve as a validation dataset in other RNA landscaping studies.
In the past decades, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has increased dramatically in Western populations. Better understanding of disease etiology along with the identification of novel prognostic and predictive biomarkers are urgently needed to improve the dismal survival probabilities. Here, we performed comprehensive RNA (coding and non-coding) profiling in various samples from 17 patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma, high-grade dysplastic or non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Per patient, a blood plasma sample, and a healthy and disease esophageal tissue sample were included. In total, this comprehensive dataset consists of 102 sequenced libraries from 51 samples. Based on this data, 119 expression profiles are available for three biotypes, including miRNA (51), mRNA (51) and circRNA (17). This unique resource allows for discovery of novel biomarkers and disease mechanisms, comparison of tissue and liquid biopsy profiles, integration of coding and non-coding RNA patterns, and can serve as a validation dataset in other RNA landscaping studies. Moreover, structural RNA differences can be identified in this dataset, including protein coding mutations, fusion genes, and circular RNAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据