4.7 Article

Nature of Five-Coordinated Al in γ-Al2O3 Revealed by Ultra-High-Field Solid-State NMR

期刊

ACS CENTRAL SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 795-803

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.1c01497

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2021YFA1502803]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21972143, 22002165, 21773230, 91945302, 21603022, 21773233]
  3. Liao Ning Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1807207]
  4. Dalian Youth Science and Technology Star Program [2019RQ079]
  5. National Science Foundation [DMR-1644779]
  6. State of Florida
  7. NSF [DMR-1039938, DMR-0603042, P41 GM122698]
  8. DICPQIBEBT [UN201808]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The surface structures of gamma-Al2O3 and Al(V)-rich Al2O3 nanosheets (Al2O3-NS) have been compared and investigated using high-field solid-state NMR, revealing important differences which may aid in understanding the structure-function relationship of alumina.
Five-coordinated Als (Al(V)) on the surface of aluminas play important roles when they are used as catalysts or catalyst supports. However, the comprehensive characterization and understanding of the intrinsic structural properties of the Al(V) remain a challenge, due to the very small amount in commonly used aluminas. Herein, the surface structures of gamma-Al2O3 and Al(V)-rich Al2O3 nanosheets (Al2O3-NS) have been investigated and compared in detail by multinuclear high-field solid-state NMR. Thanks to the high resolution and sensitivity of ultra-high-field (up to 35.2 T) NMR, the arrangements of surface Als were clearly demonstrated, which are substantially different from the bulk phase in gamma-Al2O3 due to the structure reconstruction. It reveals for the first time that most of the commonly observed Al(V)s tend to exist as aggregated states on the surface of gamma-Al2O3, like those in amorphous Al2O3-NS liable to structure reconstruction. Our new insights into surface Al(V) species may help in understanding the structure-function relationship of alumina.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据