4.2 Article

Optimizing the implementation of a multisite feasibility trial of a mind-body program in acute orthopedic trauma

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 642-653

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibac004

关键词

Implementation; Orthopedic trauma; Mind-body; Live video; Reverse translation

资金

  1. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health [U01AT010462-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to develop a mind-body program for patients with acute orthopedic injuries and explored the barriers and facilitators of implementing the program in three orthopedic trauma centers. Lack of knowledge and comfort addressing psychosocial factors, organizational cultures, and limited resources were identified as major barriers, while fitting with clinic structure and patients' basic needs were found to be facilitators. Recommendations to enhance implementation included providing knowledge/tools for providers, streamlining recruitment procedures, creating a learning collaborative, tailoring the study protocol, and dedicating research staff.
The Toolkit for Optimal Recovery (TOR) is a mind-body program for patients with acute orthopedic injuries who are at risk for persistent pain/disability. In preparation for a multisite feasibility trial of TOR at three orthopedic trauma centers, we aim to qualitatively identify barriers and facilitators to study implementation and strategies to mitigate the implementation barriers and leverage facilitators.We conducted 18 live video focus groups among providers and three one-on-one interviews with department chiefs at Level 1 trauma centers in three geographically diverse sites (N = 79 participants). Using a content analysis approach, we detected the site-specific barriers and facilitators of implementation of TOR clinical trial. We organized the data according to 26 constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), mapped to three Proctor implementation outcomes relevant to the desired study outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility). Across the three sites, we mapped six of the CFIR constructs to acceptability, eight to appropriateness, and three to feasibility. Prominent perceived barriers across all three sites were related to providers' lack of knowledge/comfort addressing psychosocial factors, and organizational cultures of prioritizing workflow efficiency over patients' psychosocial needs (acceptability), poor fit between TOR clinical trial and the fast-paced clinic structure as well as basic needs of some patients (appropriateness), and limited resources (feasibility). Suggestions to maximize the implementation of the TOR trial included provision of knowledge/tools to improve providers' confidence, streamlining study recruitment procedures, creating a learning collaborative, tailoring the study protocol based on local needs assessments, exercising flexibility in conducting research, dedicating research staff, and identifying/promoting champions and using novel incentive structures with regular check-ins, while keeping study procedures as nonobtrusive and language as de-stigmatizing as possible. These data could serve as a blueprint for implementation of clinical research and innovations in orthopedic and other medical settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据