4.6 Article

Multi-criteria ordered clustering of countries in the Global Health Security Index

期刊

SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101331

关键词

Global health security index; Clustering; PROMETHEE II; Uncertain parameters

资金

  1. CNPq, Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a multi-criteria ordered clustering procedure to improve the segmentation of nations in the GHSI database. The results suggest that the segmentation of the 2019's GHSI should be reviewed.
The Global Health Security Index (GHSI) categorizes countries according to a composite score. It is proposed as a means to alert governments and health institutions about the gaps of national health systems to compromise with the detection and management of biological threats. Recently, several criticisms have been addressed to the scoring, ranking and segmentation process underlying the computation and usage of this index, the construction process and to the quality of information sources from which component indicators and sub-indicators are collected. In this article, we propose a multi-criteria ordered clustering procedure, based on the PROMETHEE II method and an iterative algorithm aimed to improve the segmentation of nations in the GHSI database. For robustness analysis purposes, this procedure is wrapped into an approach which considers the uncertain nature of data and parameters. The application considering 195 countries in the 2019's GHSI is performed. This approach is also compared to k-means. Clusters different from segments proposed in GHSI and k-means are found. Based on our robustness analysis, three groups can be identified: robustly assigned nations (clearly belonging to a cluster); weakly and possibly assigned nations (belonging to a cluster, but ambiguously); and nonassigned countries (without any cluster to allocate them). Results suggest that the 2019's GHSI segments should be reviewed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据