4.0 Article

The Response of Emergency Departments (EDs) to the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Experience of 5 EDs in a Paris-Based Academic Hospital Trust

期刊

QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 46-52

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000351

关键词

COVID-19; disaster risk; emergency department; management; organization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the organizational and managerial tools implemented in 5 academic EDs in a heavily affected region in France during the COVID-19 pandemic. The EDs focused on early detection, isolation measures, and tailored strategies based on the real-time PCR COVID-19 positivity rate. The crisis highlighted hospitals' adaptability and coordination in reallocating resources and optimizing patient pathways.
The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has imposed unforeseen and unprecedented constraints on emergency departments (EDs). In this study, we detail the organizational and managerial tools recently implemented among 5 academic EDs in a French region particularly affected by COVID-19 and analyze how EDs responded to the COVID-19-related disease burden during different phases of the epidemic. Initially, they focused on the early detection of suspected cases by identifying 3 predominant COVID-19 syndromes. During this diagnostic process, patients were placed in respiratory isolation (facial mask before triage) and droplet isolation (ED rooms). A 3-level strategy for triage, clinical pathways in the EDs, and the organization of hospital spaces was based on the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) COVID-19 positivity rate, with ED strategies adapted to the exigencies of each level. This crisis demonstrated hospitals' adaptability and capacity to mobilize in the face of new risks, with hospitals and EDs coordinating their management to reallocate resources, optimize interoperability, and rethink patient pathways. This report on their processes may assist hospitals and EDs in areas currently spared by the new variants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据