4.7 Review

The use of soft X-ray tomography to explore mitochondrial structure and function

期刊

MOLECULAR METABOLISM
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2021.101421

关键词

Structural biology; Cell mapping; Tomography; Spatial biology; Mitochondria

资金

  1. Bridge Institute at the USC Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience
  2. Burroughs Wellcome Fund Travel Award
  3. NIH NIGMS [P30GM138441]
  4. DOE's Office of Biological and Environmental Research [DE-AC02-5CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review highlights the use of soft X-ray tomography (SXT) as a high-throughput approach to quantify mitochondrial structure and function under various cellular conditions. SXT allows unbiased, label-free imaging of intact whole cells and provides unique information about organelles.
Background: Mitochondria are cellular organelles responsible for energy production, and dysregulation of the mitochondrial network is associated with many disease states. To fully characterize the mitochondrial network's structure and function, a three-dimensional whole cell mapping technique is required. Scope of review: This review highlights the use of soft X-ray tomography (SXT) as a relatively high-throughput approach to quantify mitochondrial structure and function under multiple cellular conditions. Major conclusions: The use of SXT opens the door for mapping cellular rearrangements during critical processes such as insulin secretion, stem cell differentiation, or disease progression. SXT provides unique information such as biochemical compositions or molecular densities of organelles and allows for unbiased, label-free imaging of intact whole cells. Mapping mitochondria in the context of the near-native cellular environment will reveal more information regarding mitochondrial network functions within the cell. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据