4.2 Article

An X-ray beam profile monitoring system at a beamline front-end combining a single-crystal diamond film and energy discrimination using droplet analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 670-676

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S1600577522002466

关键词

X-ray beam profile monitor; pinhole; single-crystal diamond; front-end; energy discrimination

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [19K12654]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K12654] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates a system for monitoring pink-beam X-rays exiting from a beamline front-end, which allows visualization of the spatial distribution of each energy component of the undulator radiation. By using single crystals and pinhole optics, good quality images were obtained with no diffraction bright spots.
This work has successfully demonstrated a system for monitoring pink-beam X-rays exiting from a beamline front-end, which has a specific spatial distribution based on each energy component. In this study, the X-rays scattered from a single-crystal chemical-vapor-deposited diamond film were converted into a cross-sectional image using pinhole optics, followed by digitization with a direct detection complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor 2D detector. By using single crystals instead of poly-crystals, good quality images were obtained with no diffraction bright spots. As a result of applying photon energy discrimination using the droplet analysis to the image information, the spatial distribution of each energy component of the undulator radiation was successfully visualized. The result was found to be in good agreement with the theoretically calculated result obtained using the synchrotron radiation calculation code SPECTRA. The new synchrotron radiation beam monitor proposed in this paper can serve as a powerful beam diagnostic tool for diffraction-limited rings that require strict light source stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据