4.2 Article

X-ray reflectivity from curved surfaces as illustrated by a graphene layer on molten copper

期刊

JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 711-720

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S1600577522002053

关键词

X-ray reflectivity; curved surfaces; methods; synchrotron

资金

  1. European Union [730872, 951943, 736299]
  2. EU [730872]
  3. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [05K19FK2]
  4. Russian Science Foundation [19-72-30009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a method for X-ray reflectivity measurement on highly curved liquid surfaces. With the use of a synchrotron diffractometer equipped with a double crystal beam deflector, the curved surfaces of liquid metals can be measured, providing electron-density profiles with atomic resolution accuracy. The proposed method is successfully applied to study the bare surface of molten copper and molten copper covered by a graphene layer.
The X-ray reflectivity technique can provide out-of-plane electron-density profiles of surfaces, interfaces, and thin films, with atomic resolution accuracy. While current methodologies require high surface flatness, this becomes challenging for naturally curved surfaces, particularly for liquid metals, due to the very high surface tension. Here, the development of X-ray reflectivity measurements with beam sizes of a few tens of micrometres on highly curved liquid surfaces using a synchrotron diffractometer equipped with a double crystal beam deflector is presented. The proposed and developed method, which uses a standard reflectivity theta-2 theta scan, is successfully applied to study in situ the bare surface of molten copper and molten copper covered by a graphene layer grown in situ by chemical vapor deposition. It was found that the roughness of the bare liquid surface of copper at 1400 K is 1.25 +/- 0.10 angstrom, while the graphene layer is separated from the liquid surface by a distance of 1.55 +/- 0.08 angstrom and has a roughness of 1.26 +/- 0.09 angstrom.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据