4.6 Article

Fabrication and properties of non-stoichiometric Tb2(Hf1-xTbx)2O7-x magneto-optical ceramics

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED CERAMICS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 784-793

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40145-022-0571-9

关键词

magneto-optical ceramics; Tb-2(Hf1-xTbx)(2)O7-x ceramics; reactive sintering; Verdet constant

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2021YFE0104800]
  2. NSFC-RFBR Cooperative Research Project [61911530135]
  3. Key Research Project of the Frontier Science of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-JSC022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-stoichiometric Tb-2(Hf1-xTbx)(2)O7-x ceramics were successfully fabricated and investigated for their phase composition, densification process, microstructure, optical transmittance, and Verdet constant. The results showed that the transmittance and Verdet constant of the ceramics increased with the increase of Tb content, and the Verdet constant was higher compared to the commercial Tb3Ga5O12 crystal, suggesting the great potential of non-stoichiometric Tb-2(Hf1-xTbx)(2)O7-x ceramics for Faraday isolator applications.
Non stoichiometric Tb-2(Hf1-xTbx)(2)O7-x (x = -0.07-0.45) magneto-optical ceramics were fabricated by solid-state reactive sintering in vacuum combined with hot isostatic pressing (HIP) post-treatment without any sintering aids. The phase composition, densification process, microstructure, optical transmittance, and Verdet constant of Tb-2(Hf1-xTbx)(2)O7-x ceramics were investigated. The in-line transmittance of (Tb0.93Hf0.07)(2)Hf2O7.07 ceramics with a thickness of 2.0 mm reaches 74.6% at 1064 nm. The Verdet constant of Tb-2(Hf1-xTbx)(2)O7-x ceramics is -153.4, -155.8, and -181.2 rad/(T.m) at the wavelength of 633 nm when x = -0.07, 0, and 0.1, respectively. The Verdet constant increases with the increase of Tb content, and these values are higher than that of the commercial Tb3Ga5O12 crystal, indicating that non-stoichiometric Tb-2(Hf1-xTbx)(2)O7-x ceramics have a great potential for the application in Faraday isolators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据