4.6 Article

Wildfire preparedness and response during the 2016 Arouca wildfires in rural Portugal

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102895

关键词

Wildfire; Preparedness; Protective response; Rural residents; Portugal

资金

  1. FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal [PCIF/AGT/0054/2017]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PCIF/AGT/0054/2017] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines how rural residents in Portugal prepared for and protected themselves and their property during the 2016 Arouca wildfires. The findings show that participants were aware of the risks and took last-minute actions to protect their homes. Despite evacuation recommendations, most participants stayed behind due to their confidence in local knowledge and emotional attachment to their property.
This study examined how residents living in rural Portugal were prepared for and took action to protect themselves and their property before and during the 2016 large Arouca wildfires. Interviews were completed with 30 residents living in small rural parishes affected by the wildfires. Qualitative research findings show that interview participants were aware of the high wildfire risk in the area but had different views about the source of risk and the immediate threat posed to their own property. During the wildfires, many participants reported taking last-minute preparatory actions such as having water, hoses, water pumps and sprinklers available. We found few differences in the preparatory roles carried out by women and men. Despite official evacuation recommendations, most participants stayed behind to protect their property. Participants' decisions to stay behind were affected by a feeling of confidence due to local knowledge and past experience, lack of trust in fire management agencies, and emotional attachment to their home and village. Participants were helped by family and village members, and in turn helped others during the wildfires. Recommendations for wildfire and emergency managers are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据