4.8 Article

Long Lasting Cellular Immune Response Induced by mRNA Vaccination: Implication for Prevention Strategies

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.836495

关键词

SARS-CoV2; mRNA vaccination; T lymphocytes activation; B lymphocytes; COVID-19

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the durability of specific immune response induced by the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and found that a majority of individuals still had Spike-specific B and T lymphocytes 7 months after the second dose, suggesting the potential for long-lasting protection and aiding in the development of future vaccination strategies.
As the COVID19 pandemic continues to spread and vaccinations are administered throughout the world at different rates and with different strategies, understanding the multiple aspects of the immune response to vaccinations is required to define more efficient vaccination strategies. To date, the duration of protection induced by COVID19 vaccines is still matter of debate. To assess whether 2-doses vaccination with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was sufficient to induce a persistent specific cellular immune response, we evaluated the presence of SARS-COV2 Spike-specific B and T lymphocytes in 28 healthcare workers 1 and 7 months after completing the vaccination cycle. The results showed that at 7 months after second dose a population of Spike-specific B lymphocytes was still present in 86% of the immunized subjects, with a higher frequency when compared to not-immunized controls (0.38% +/- 0.07 vs 0.13% +/- 0.03, p<0.001). Similarly, specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, able to respond in vitro to stimulation with Spike derived peptides, were found at 7 months. These results confirm that vaccination with BNT162b2 is able to induce a specific immune response, potentially long lasting, and could be helpful in defining future vaccination strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据