4.3 Review

Multiple-Patient Simulations and Student Outcomes in Prelicensure Nursing Education: An Integrative Review

期刊

CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 31-45

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.11.007

关键词

multiple-patient simulation; multi-patient simulation; integrative review; nursing; prelicensure; student; outcomes

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This integrative review examines the current state of research on prelicensure nursing student outcomes in multiple-patient simulation. The findings are limited and inconclusive, highlighting the need for further research to support evidence-based teaching in prelicensure nursing education.
Background: Prelicensure nursing students generally provide care for only one or two patients within the clinical setting. This model does not allow students to develop the essential leadership skills of prioritization, delegation, critical thinking/clinical reasoning, and interprofessional collaboration and communication. Simulation offers an ideal opportunity for nursing students to manage multiple-patient assignments in a safe space. The purpose of this integrative review was to present the current state of the science related to prelicensure nursing student outcomes associated with multiple-patient simulation. Methods: Database searches of CINAHL, PubMed, Emcare, and Scopus identified 298 articles for review. Results: Eleven articles (six quantitative, four mixed-methods, and one qualitative) were isolated for inclusion in this integrative review. Conclusion: There is limited robust research exploring prelicensure nursing students' outcomes related to multiple-patient simulation. While current evidence suggests that multiple-patient simulations may increase students' confidence and competence in some aspects of managing multiple-patient assignments, the findings are generally disparate and not generalizable. More research is warranted to provide support for evidence-based teaching related to multiple-patient simulations in prelicensure nursing education.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据