4.6 Article

Wavelet-Based Multi-Class Seizure Type Classification System

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12115702

关键词

diagnostics; dual-tree complex wavelet transform (DTCWT); electroencephalography (EEG); epilepsy; LightGBM; seizure type classification

资金

  1. University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an automatic technique using dual-tree complex wavelet transform (DTCWT) to extract features from epileptic seizures' EEG signals and classify them. The proposed technique achieved excellent results in seizure-wise and patient-wise classification, setting new benchmark results in this field.
Epilepsy is one of the most common brain diseases that affects more than 1% of the world's population. It is characterized by recurrent seizures, which come in different types and are treated differently. Electroencephalography (EEG) is commonly used in medical services to diagnose seizures and their types. The accurate identification of seizures helps to provide optimal treatment and accurate information to the patient. However, the manual diagnostic procedures of epileptic seizures are laborious and require professional skills. This paper presents a novel automatic technique that involves the extraction of specific features from epileptic seizures' EEG signals using dual-tree complex wavelet transform (DTCWT) and classifying them into one of the seven types of seizures, including absence, complex-partial, focal non-specific, generalized non-specific, simple-partial, tonic-clonic, and tonic seizures. We evaluated the proposed technique on the TUH EEG Seizure Corpus (TUSZ) ver.1.5.2 dataset and compared the performance with the existing state-of-the-art techniques using the overall F1-score due to class imbalance of seizure types. Our proposed technique achieved the best results of a weighted F1-score of 99.1% and 74.7% for seizure-wise and patient-wise classification, respectively, thereby setting new benchmark results for this dataset.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据