4.6 Article

A Multidisciplinary Methodology for Technological Knowledge, Characterization and Diagnostics: Sandstone Facades in Florentine Architectural Heritage

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12094266

关键词

built cultural heritage; diagnostics; architectural survey; NDT; pietraforte

资金

  1. GARCV20CITTAMETROPOLITANA_MEDICIRICCARDI Citta Metropolitana di Firenze [EMANUELEINTRIERIRICTD2122]
  2. University of Florence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a study on the Historic Center of Florence, focusing on the analysis and characterization of the sandstone building material. The research aims to improve understanding and propose new restoration solutions to protect the cultural heritage and ensure visitor safety in Florence.
The Historic Center of Florence, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, includes many examples of architecture characterized by rough-hewn rusticated block facades-a very common masonry technique in the Florentine Renaissance-made in Pietraforte sandstone. The latter features numerous criticalities related to its intrinsic characteristics and to decay phenomena that are due to weathering and pollution. A multidisciplinary methodology has been developed starting from historic analysis and architectural survey to a complete optometric, mechanical, physical, mineralogical, and petrographic characterization of rough-hewn rusticated blocks, applied to the case study of the Palazzo Medici Riccardi facades. The studies performed in this work cover several research fields, from architecture to geology, going through material diagnostics, and aim at improving knowledge and designing new restoration solutions for Pietraforte building-material criticalities. The research proposes an operative protocol aimed at supporting restoration projects and monitoring plans, with the aim to protect historical, architectural, and artistic cultural heritage and to safeguard the people who visit the city of Florence every year.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据