4.6 Review

Black Fungi on Stone-Built Heritage: Current Knowledge and Future Outlook

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12083969

关键词

stone cultural heritage; black fungi; MCF; biodeterioration; control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article provides a comprehensive analysis and review of black fungi as the main biodeterioration agents of cultural heritage stone artifacts. The main findings include a checklist of black fungal taxa involved in the biodeterioration of stone-built heritage, the main biodeterioration pattern attributed to them, and the methods of study including new molecular advances. The article also discusses current approaches to control black fungi and future research directions.
Featured Application This is an updated review on black fungi as main biodeteriogens of cultural heritage stone artifacts. Colonization pattern, taxonomy, and methods to eradicate their settlement are discussed here. Black fungi are considered as one of the main group of microorganisms responsible for the biodeterioration of stone cultural heritage artifacts. In this paper, we provide a critical analysis and review of more than 30 years of studies on black fungi isolated from stone-built heritage from 1990 to date. More than 109 papers concerning the fungal biodeterioration activity of stone were analysed. The main findings were a check list of the black fungal taxa involved in the biodeterioration of stone-built heritage, with a particular reference to meristematic black fungi, the main biodeterioration pattern attributed to them, and the methods of study including the new molecular advances. A particular focus was to discuss the current approaches to control black fungi from stone-built heritage and future perspectives. Black fungi are notoriously hard to remove or mitigate, so new methods of study and of control are needed, but it is also important to combine classical methods with new approaches to improve current knowledge to implement future conservation strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据