4.6 Article

Attention Map-Guided Visual Explanations for Deep Neural Networks

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12083846

关键词

explainable artificial intelligence; visual explanation; attention mechanism

资金

  1. Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) - Korean government (MSIT) [2020-0-00107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on attention-map-guided visual explanations for deep neural networks to improve their interpretability in areas such as healthcare, finance, and defense. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms other methods significantly.
Deep neural network models perform well in a variety of domains, such as computer vision, recommender systems, natural language processing, and defect detection. In contrast, in areas such as healthcare, finance, and defense, deep neural network models, due to their lack of explainability, are not trusted by users. In this paper, we focus on attention-map-guided visual explanations for deep neural networks. We employ an attention mechanism to find the most important region of an input image. The Grad-CAM method is used to extract the feature map for deep neural networks, and then the attention mechanism is used to extract the high-level attention maps. The attention map, which highlights the important region in the image for the target class, can be seen as a visual explanation of a deep neural network. We evaluate our method using two common metrics: average drop and percentage increase. For a more effective experiment, we also propose a new metric to evaluate our method. The experiments were carried out to show that the proposed method works better than the state-of-the-art explainable artificial intelligence method. Our approach can provide a lower average drop and higher percent increase when compared to other methods and find a more explanatory region, especially in the first twenty percent region of the input image.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据