4.6 Article

Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Analyses of Self-Assembled Monolayers of Octadecyltrimethoxysilane on SiO2 Substrate

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12104932

关键词

time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS); self-assembled monolayers (SAMs); octadecyltrimethoxysilane (OTMs); condensation reaction; homocondesation reaction; ion fragmentation; interface chemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the interface chemistry of organosilane self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) through the use of time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS). A comparison of ion fragmentation differences between octadecyltrimethoxysilane (OTMS) SAMs, free OTMS molecules, and oxide substrates was conducted. It was demonstrated that ToF-SIMS is capable of verifying the hydrolysis of OTMS molecules and assessing the polymerized -Si-O-Si- network in their SAMs. This provides unique information for understanding the interface chemistry of OTMS SAMs formed on oxides.
The self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of organosilanes formed on an oxide substrate are thought to have a polymerized -Si-O-Si- network due to the homocondensation of silanols of hydrolyzed silane headgroups, which is the most significant difference in the SAMs of organosilanes in comparison with those of alkanethoils and organophsosphonic acids. In order to explore the interface chemistry of organosilane SAMs, surface-sensitive time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) was used to compare ion fragmentation differences between the SAMs of octadecyltrimethoxysilane (OTMS) formed on a SiO2 substrate and free OTMS molecules, as well as oxide substrate. The ability of ToF-SIMS to verify the hydrolysis of the methoxy groups of OTMS molecules and to assess the polymerized -Si-O-Si- network in their SAMs was demonstrated, which shows that ToF-SIMS provides unique information to help us understand the interface chemistry of OTMS SAMs formed on oxides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据