4.6 Article

Recovery of Carotenoids from Tomato Pomace Using a Hydrofluorocarbon Solvent in Sub-Critical Conditions

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12062822

关键词

functional enriched oils; tomato by-products; extraction yield; oleaginous co-matrix; carotenoid solubility; hydrofluorocarbon solvent; fatty acids profile

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully enriched carotenoid-rich oil from tomato peels by using Norflurane as a solvent in subcritical conditions.
The enrichment of oils with nutraceutical bioactive phytomolecules allows the achievement of functional oil-based products of great interest in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic fields. Carotenoids, such as lycopene and beta-carotene, are available at a high concentration in tomatoes and tomato waste products, as peels, seeds, and pulp; their recovery is recently attracting growing interest and economic importance in the food industry, and also in consideration of the huge amount of industrial waste produced. The aim of this work is to study the production of an oil functionalized with carotenoids from tomato peels. The extractions were carried out using an innovative process based on the use of commercial Norflurane as solvent in subcritical conditions. Extraction trials were performed on dried tomato peels, with the addition of tomato seeds or wheat germ flour as sources of oily co-solvents, capable of also preserving the biological characteristics of the carotenoids extracted. Although lycopene solubility in Norflurane is quite low, the solvent recirculation and regeneration were allowed to reach a concentration in the oily extracts of approximately 0.3 mg/g(oil) after 2 h of the process. The enrichment in beta-carotene was more pronounced, and concentrations of 0.733 mg/g(oil) and 0.952 mg/g(oil) were observed in wheat germ and tomato seed oils, respectively. The results obtained in this study were compared with those obtained by traditional and supercritical CO2 extraction methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据