How the Direction of Screws Affects the Primary Stability of a Posterior Malleolus Osteosynthesis under Torsional Loading: A Biomechanical Study

Insufficient fixation of a posterior malleolus fracture (PM) can lead to posttraumatic complications such as osteoarthritis and chronic pain. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to test the hypothesis of whether the direction of PM screw fixation has an impact on the primary stability of osteosynthesis of a PM under torsional loading. PM fractures of 7 pairs human cadaveric lower leg specimens were stabilized with posterior to anterior (p.a.) or anterior to posterior (a.p.) screw fixation. Stability of the osteosynthesis was biomechanically tested using cyclic external torsional loading levels, in 2 Nm steps from 2 Nm up to 12 Nm, under constant monitoring with 3D ultrasonic marker (Zebris). The primary stability does not differ between both stabilizations (p = 0.378) with a medium effect size (eta(2)(p) = 0.065). The movement of the PM tends to be marginally greater for the osteosynthesis with a.p. screws than with p.a. screws. Whether a.p. screws or the alternative p.a. screw fixation is performed does not seem to have an influence on the primary stability of the osteosynthesis of the PM fixation under torsional loading. Although osteosynthesis from posterior seems to be more stable, the biomechanical results in the torsional test show quite equivalent stabilities. If there is no significant dislocation of the PM, a.p. screw fixation could be a minimally invasive but stable surgical strategy.

Automated summary

The direction of PM screw fixation does not affect the primary stability of osteosynthesis of a posterior malleolus fracture. However, anterior to posterior screw fixation may result in slightly greater movement of the fracture. Anterior to posterior screw fixation could be a minimally invasive but stable surgical strategy for posterior malleolus fractures without significant dislocation.