4.6 Article

Mode Choice Effects on Bike Sharing Systems

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12094391

关键词

bike-sharing system (BSS); mode choice; stated choice experiment; multinomial logit model; transport demand model

资金

  1. state of Hessian and the House of Logistics (HOLM) in the program Innovations in logistics and mobility of the Hessian Ministry for Economic Affairs, Energy, Transport and Housing [1013/21-15]
  2. Open Access Publication Fund of RheinMain University of Applied Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a study that aims to estimate the choice parameters of station-based bike-sharing systems (BSS) through a survey, in order to simulate the effects of modal shifts in transport demand models.
Bike-sharing systems (BSS) are offered in many cities and urban municipalities and urban areas without such systems are thinking about their introduction. In addition, many studies on BSS are available; however, neither mode nor route choice parameters are available for station-based BSS, which are required for the implementation of BSS in local and regional transport demand models. As a result, this makes it impossible to simulate demand model-based effects of these systems on other transport modes and e.g., calculate scenario-guided modal shifts. The paper presents results obtained from a survey study, which aims to estimate BSS-related choice parameters. The study combined computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI) for a collection of revealed preferences (RP) on the use of BSS with a follow-up paper-and-pencil survey on stated preferences (SP) of 220 BSS users and non-users from the Rhine-Neckar area in mid-west Germany. Considering the three transport modes BSS, public transport (PT), and private motorized transport (PMT), results from this choice experiment and, according to behavioural parameters, allow integration of BSS in transport demand models and a simulation of modal shifts. Survey design, mode-choice experiment, and choice models are presented in this paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据