4.6 Article

Predictive Maintenance for Remanufacturing Based on Hybrid-Driven Remaining Useful Life Prediction

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12073218

关键词

circular economy; remanufacturing; predictive maintenance; condition monitoring; remaining useful life prediction; dynamic maintenance scheduling

资金

  1. RECLAIM project Remanufacturing and Refurbishment Large Industrial Equipment
  2. European Commission [869884]
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [869884] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Remanufacturing is a crucial activity in the circular economy model, aiming to prolong the lifespan of products and materials and reduce resource waste. This research proposes a predictive maintenance framework that combines remaining useful life prediction and condition monitoring methods, which has been proven effective through experimentation.
Remanufacturing is an activity of the circular economy model whose purpose is to keep the high value of products and materials. As opposed to the currently employed linear economic model, remanufacturing targets the extension of products and reduces the unnecessary and wasteful use of resources. Remanufacturing, along with health status monitoring, constitutes a key element for lifetime extension and reuse of large industrial equipment. The major challenge is to determine if a machine is worth remanufacturing and when is the optimal time to perform remanufacturing. The present work proposes a new predictive maintenance framework for the remanufacturing process based on a combination of remaining useful life prediction and condition monitoring methods. A hybrid-driven approach was used to combine the advantages of the knowledge model and historical data. The proposed method has been verified on the realistic run-to-failure rolling bearing degradation dataset. The experimental results combined with visualization analysis have proven the effectiveness of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据