4.6 Article

Droplets Transmission Mechanism in a Commercial Wide-Body Aircraft Cabin

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12104889

关键词

aircraft cabin; ventilation system; droplets transmission; infection risk; numerical simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the droplets transmission process in a commercial aircraft under different ventilation systems using CFD simulations, and assessed the infection risk of passengers with an improved Wells-Riley model. The results showed that the type of ventilation system and the location of the infectious source determined the transmission mechanism of droplets in the aircraft cabin. A new ventilation system was proposed, which reduced the infection risk by 27% compared to the sidewall mixing ventilation system.
COVID-19 is a respiratory infectious disease that spreads readily between people, and an urgent issue of passengers' exposure risk assessment in commercial aircraft has been raised because an aircraft cabin as a confined space may carry and transmit the disease worldwide. In this study, the droplets transmission process under different ventilation systems in a twin-aisle wide-body aircraft was studied using CFD simulations and the infection risk of passengers was assessed by the improved Wells-Riley model. Numerical results found that the transmission mechanism of droplets in the aircraft cabin was different depending on the type of ventilation systems and the location of the infectious source. Annular airflow could effectively enhance the ability of droplets transmission, while direct airflow, represented by displacement ventilation, could significantly inhibit droplets transmission. Accordingly, a new type of ventilation system was proposed based on the concept that the overall space is organized by annular airflow and the local area is direct airflow. Compared with sidewall mixing ventilation system, the infection risk of the new ventilation system presented in this study is reduced by 27%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据