4.6 Article

Multi-Criteria Decision Making in the PMEDM Process by Using MARCOS, TOPSIS, and MAIRCA Methods

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Engineering, Manufacturing

Optimization of grinding titanium with 2%CNT-CBN wheel using TOPSIS

Deborah Serenade Stephen et al.

Summary: This research focuses on developing a new grinding wheel for machining difficult-to-machine metals. The addition of carbon nanotubes to the abrasive material improves the surface finish. Both theoretical and experimental approaches are used to determine the optimal grinding parameters.

MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES (2022)

Article Engineering, Manufacturing

Multi-criteria decision making under the MARCOS method and the weighting methods: applied to milling, grinding and turning processes

Do Duc Trung

Summary: This paper presents a multi-criteria decision-making study for three common machining methods: milling, grinding, and turning. The weights of the criteria were determined using four different methods, and the best alternative was found based on the weights determined using the Equal weight and Entropy weight methods.

MANUFACTURING REVIEW (2022)

Proceedings Paper Materials Science, Multidisciplinary

AHP-MARCOS, a hybrid model for selecting gears and cutting fluids

Binu Varghese et al.

Summary: This paper discusses the aspects that can assist designers and manufacturers in making the best choices when selecting gear materials and cutting fluids. By utilizing a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method, the appropriate gear material and cutting fluid are determined, and their performance is evaluated and compared.

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS (2022)

Article Engineering, Manufacturing

A multi-criteria decision-making in turning process using the MAIRCA, EAMR, MARCOS and TOPSIS methods: A comparative study

D. D. Trung et al.

Summary: This study presents the results of a multi-criteria decision-making study conducted on sixteen experiments on turning process, using four decision-making methods in combination with two determination methods of weights, resulting in eight ranking solutions for the experiments. Interestingly, all eight solutions identified the same best experiment, indicating the effectiveness of the methods used in this study for multi-criteria decision-making in various cases and processes.

ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT (2021)

Review Automation & Control Systems

A review: use of evolutionary algorithm for optimisation of machining parameters

Nor Atiqah Zolpakar et al.

Summary: Importance: Optimisation of machining parameters is crucial for higher productivity and better outcomes. Research content: Review of past studies focusing on minimum surface roughness, highest material removal rate, lowest production cost, and shortest production time. Optimisation methods: Traditional methods include parametric, experimental, and numerical approaches, while recent studies have utilized evolutionary algorithms, genetic algorithms, and other statistical methods for optimisation.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY (2021)

Article Engineering, Chemical

Multi-Performance Optimization in Electrical Discharge Machining of Al2O3 Ceramics Using Taguchi Base AHP Weighted TOPSIS Method

Yue-Peng Zeng et al.

Summary: The study optimized the EDM machining parameters of Al2O3 ceramics using Taguchi based TOPSIS coupled with AHP weight method, achieving better multi-performance results. Through experimental and statistical techniques, the optimal combination levels were determined, leading to consistent predicted values with experimental values.

PROCESSES (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Assessment of distribution center locations using a multi-expert subjective-objective decision-making approach

Mehdi Keshavarz-Ghorabaee

Summary: Distribution is a strategic function of logistics in different companies. Establishing distribution centers in appropriate locations is important for reaching long-term goals and maintaining good customer relationships. This study proposes a decision-making approach based on multiple criteria decision-making methods to assess DC locations, showing efficiency and congruent results with existing MCDM methods.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2021)

Review Business

An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis

Yakup Celikbilek et al.

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT ANALYTICS (2020)

Proceedings Paper Materials Science, Multidisciplinary

Multi Objective Optimization during Small Hole Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) of Ti-6Al-4V using TOPSIS

S. Rajamanickam et al.

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS (2019)

Article Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence

The use of improved TOPSIS method based on experimental design and Chebyshev regression in solving MCDM problems

Peng Wang et al.

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING (2017)

Article Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots

Ljubomir J. Gigovic et al.

SUSTAINABILITY (2016)

Article Engineering, Manufacturing

Multiresponse Optimization of Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Process Parameters Using TOPSIS Approach

N. Yuvaraj et al.

MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES (2015)

Article Engineering, Manufacturing

Grinding Wheel Abrasive Material Selection Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method

Saikat Ranjan Maity et al.

MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES (2013)