4.8 Article

Electron Donor-Acceptor Interface of TPPS/PDI Boosting Charge Transfer for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202201134

关键词

charge separation; electron transfer; interfacial electric field; photocatalytic hydrogen production; TPPS; PDI

资金

  1. Chinese National Science Foundation [21872077, 21621003]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project of China [2020YFA0710304]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021M691770]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work successfully constructed an electron donor-acceptor (D-A) interface with high charge separation for boosting photocatalytic H-2 evolution. The TPPS/PDI with D-A interface showed significantly improved H-2 evolution rate, stronger internal electric field, and longer excited state lifetime compared to pure TPPS and PDI. This study provides new ideas for designing materials with D-A interface to achieve high photocatalytic activity.
Charge separation efficiency of photocatalysts is still the key scientific issue for solar-to-chemical energy conversion. In this work, an electron donor-acceptor (D-A) interface with high charge separation between TPPS (tetra(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphyrin) and PDI (perylene diimide) is successfully constructed for boosting photocatalytic H-2 evolution. The TPPS/PDI with D-A interface shows excellent photocatalytic H-2 evolution rate of 546.54 mu mol h(-1) (30.36 mmol h(-1) g(-1)), which is 9.95 and 9.41 times higher than that of pure TPPS and PDI, respectively. The TPPS/PDI has a markedly stronger internal electric field, which is respectively 3.76 and 3.01 times higher than that of pure PDI and TPPS. The D-A interface with giant internal electric field efficiently facilitates charge separation and urges TPPS/PDI to have a longer excited state lifetime than single component. The work provides entirely new ideas for designing materials with D-A interface to realize high photocatalytic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据