4.8 Article

Breaking the Limitation of Elevated Coulomb Interaction in Crystalline Carbon Nitride for Visible and Near-Infrared Light Photoactivity

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202201677

关键词

Coulomb interaction; crystalline carbon nitride; electron concentrations; near-infrared response; n-type doping

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51874199, 22078200, 22102103]
  2. SZIIT [SZIIT2022KJ026]
  3. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515111021, 2021A1515010162]
  4. Shenzhen Innovation Program [JCYJ20170818142642395]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an n-type doping strategy using alkaline earth metal ions in polymeric carbon nitride (KCN) was proposed to enhance the visible and near-infrared photoactivity. The n-type doping increased electron densities and activated electron transitions, resulting in NIR light absorption. Furthermore, the strategy improved carrier mobility and conductivity, facilitating charge transfer and separation.
Most near-infrared (NIR) light-responsive photocatalysts inevitably suffer from low charge separation due to the elevated Coulomb interaction between electrons and holes. Here, an n-type doping strategy of alkaline earth metal ions is proposed in crystalline K+ implanted polymeric carbon nitride (KCN) for visible and NIR photoactivity. The n-type doping significantly increases the electron densities and activates the n ->pi* electron transitions, producing NIR light absorption. In addition, the more localized valence band (VB) and the regulation of carrier effective mass and band decomposed charge density, as well as the improved conductivity by 1-2 orders of magnitude facilitate the charge transfer and separation. The proposed n-type doping strategy improves the carrier mobility and conductivity, activates the n ->pi* electron transitions for NIR light absorption, and breaks the limitation of poor charge separation caused by the elevated Coulomb interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据