4.8 Article

Metal-Free Perovskite Piezoelectric Nanogenerators for Human-Machine Interfaces and Self-Powered Electrical Stimulation Applications

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202105974

关键词

metal-free perovskites; piezoelectric nanogenerators; human-machine interfaces; cytotoxicity; electrical stimulation

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [108-2636-E-038-003, 109-2636-E-008-010, 110-2636-E-008-009, 110-2221-E-011-076]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work reports the intrinsic piezoelectricity in metal-free perovskite films and evaluates their low toxicity. A piezoelectric nanogenerator is fabricated using the synthesized metal-free perovskite, demonstrating excellent output voltage and current. This work highlights the importance of perovskite-based generators for future advanced sensors and therapeutic systems.
Single crystal metal-free halide perovskites have received great attention in recent years owing to their excellent piezoelectric and ferroelectric properties. However, the nanotoxicity and piezoelectricity within the nanoscale of such materials have yet been reported for the demonstration of practical applications. In this work, the observation of intrinsic piezoelectricity in metal-free perovskite (MDABCO-NH4I3) films using piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) is reported. A cytotoxicity test is also performed on MDABCO-NH4I3 to evaluate its low-toxic nature. The as-synthesized MDABCO-NH4I3 is further integrated into a piezoelectric nanogenerator (PENG). The MDABCO-NH4I3-based PENG (MN-PENG) exhibits optimal output voltage and current of 15.9 V and 54.5 nA, respectively. In addition, the MN-PENG can serve as a self-powered strain sensor for human-machine interface applications or be adopted in in vitro electrical stimulation devices. This work demonstrates a path of perovskite-based PENG with high performance, low toxicity, and multifunctionality for future advanced wearable sensors and portable therapeutic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据