4.6 Article

Cpmer: A new conserved eEF1A2-binding partner that regulates Eomes translation and cardiomyocyte differentiation

期刊

STEM CELL REPORTS
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 1154-1169

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.03.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [2018YFA0800100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31830059, 31970599, 32170575, 31871298, 31721003, 32000605]
  3. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [20QA1409600]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [22120220104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) called Cpmer was identified to interact with eEF1A2 and co-regulate the differentiation of mouse and human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Cpmer specifically recognized Eomes mRNA and facilitated the binding of eEF1A2 with Eomes mRNA, ensuring the translation of Eomes mRNA and cardiomyocyte differentiation.
Previous studies have shown that eukaryotic elongation factor 1A2 (eEF1A2) serves as an essential heart-specific translation elongation element and that its mutation or knockout delays heart development and causes congenital heart disease and death among species. However, the function and regulatory mechanisms of eEF1A2 in mammalian heart development remain largely unknown. Here we identified the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) Cpmer (cytoplasmic mesoderm regulator), which interacted with eEF1A2 to co-regulate differentiation of mouse and human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Mechanistically, Cpmer specifically recognized Eomes mRNA by RNA RNA pairing and facilitated binding of eEF1A2 with Eomes mRNA, guaranteeing Eomes mRNA translation and cardiomyocyte differentiation. Our data reveal a novel functionally conserved lncRNA that can specifically regulate Eomes translation and cardiomyocyte differentiation, which broadens our understanding of the mechanism of lncRNA involvement in the subtle translational regulation of eEF1A2 during mammalian heart development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据