4.5 Article

Composite Short-Path Nonadiabatic Holonomic Quantum Gates

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.034015

关键词

-

资金

  1. Key-Area Research and Development Program of GuangDong Province [2018B030326001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11874156]
  3. Sci-ence and Technology Program of Guangzhou [2019050001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the implementation of nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation (NHQC) with the shortest path using inverse Hamiltonian engineering technique, which offers higher fidelity and stronger robustness. The gate performance in this scheme can be further improved by using composite dynamical decoupling pulses. This scheme represents a promising progress towards future fault-tolerant quantum computation.
Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation (NHQC) has attracted significant attention due to its fast evolution and the geometric nature-induced resilience to local noises. However, its long operation time and complex physical implementation make it hard to surpass the dynamical scheme, and thus hindering its wide application. Here, we present to implement NHQC with the shortest path under some conditions, through the inverse Hamiltonian engineering technique, which posseses higher fidelity and stronger robustness than previous NHQC schemes. Meanwhile, the gate performance in our scheme can be further improved by using the proposed composite dynamical decoupling pulses, which can efficiently improve both the gate fidelity and robustness, making our scheme outperform the optimal dynamical scheme in a certain parameter range. Remarkably, our scheme can be readily implemented with Rydberg atoms, and a simplified implementation of the controlled-not gate in the Rydberg blockade regime can be achieved. Therefore, our scheme represents a promising progress towards future fault-tolerant quantum computation in atomic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据