4.6 Article

Determination of exercise intensity domains during upright versus supine cycling: a methodological study

期刊

PEERJ
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13199

关键词

Sports Constant load exercise; Skeletal muscle oxygenation; Critical power; Metabolic flexibility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of posture on indicators of exercise intensity during supine cycling. The results showed that the rate of oxygen uptake and peak oxygen uptake were lower in the supine position compared to the upright position. The study suggests that including moderate-intensity step-transitions before a ramp CPET could help determine appropriate exercise intensity domains for supine cycling.
Background: There is a growing interest among the research community and clinical practitioners to investigate cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) procedures and protocols utilized in supine cycling. Materials and Methods: The current study investigated the effects of posture on indicators of exercise intensity including gas exchange threshold (GET), respiratory compensation point (RCP), and the rate of peak oxygen uptake (V?O2 peak), as well as the role of V?O2 mean response time (MRT) in determining exercise intensity domains in nineteen healthy men (age: 22 +/- 3 years). Two moderate-intensity step-transitions from 20 to 100 Watt (W) were completed, followed by a maximal CPET. After completing the ramp test, participants performed a constant-load at 90% of their attained peak power output (PPO). Results: No differences were observed in the V?O2 MRT between the two positions, although the phase II-time constant (Tau V? O2p) was 7 s slower in supine position compared to upright (p = 0.001). The rate of O2 uptake in the supine position at GET and RCP were lower compared to the upright position (208 +/- 200 mLmiddotmin-1 (p = 0.007) and 265 +/- 235 mLmiddotmin-1 (p = 0.012) respectively). Besides, V? O2 peak was significantly decreased (by 6%, p = 0.002) during supine position. These findings were confirmed by the wide limits of agreement between the measures of V?O2 in different postures (V? O2 peak: -341 to 859; constant-load test: -528 to 783; GET: -375 to 789; RCP: -520 to 1021 all in mLmiddotmin-1). Conclusion: Since an accurate identification of an appropriate power output (PO) from a single-visit CPET remains a matter of debate, especially for supine cycling, we propose that moderate-intensity step-transitions preceding a ramp CPET could be a viable addition to ensure appropriate exercise-intensity domain determination, in particular upon GET-based prescription.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据