4.7 Article

Improved Characteristics of CdSe/CdS/ZnS Core-Shell Quantum Dots Using an Oleylamine-Modified Process

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12060909

关键词

application of nanomaterials; quantum dots; ZnO; one-pot synthesis; oleylamine; aging test

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [107-2221-E-005-058-MY3, 108-2811-E-005-512-MY3, 108-2221-E-005-072-MY3]
  2. Innovation and Development Center of Sustainable Agriculture from the Featured Areas Research Center Program within Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CdSe/CdS core/shell quantum dots with different oleylamine (OLA) concentrations were synthesized using a one-pot method. The presence of ZnS diffraction peaks indicated the formation of a ZnS shell on the CdSe/CdS core. Interestingly, QDs with higher OLA concentration exhibited diffraction peaks of ZnS/ZnO, showing better thermal stability and slower decay in photoluminescence intensity. These QDs with tunable emission wavelength are suitable for micro-LED display applications.
CdSe/CdS with ZnS/ZnO shell quantum dots (QDs) are synthesized by a one-pot method with various oleylamine (OLA) contents. The crystal structures of the QDs were analyzed by X-ray diffractometry, which showed ZnS diffraction peaks. It was represented that the ZnS shell was formed on the surface of the CdSe/CdS core. Interestingly, QDs with a high OLA concentration exhibit diffraction peaks of ZnS/ZnO. As a result, the thermal stability of QDs with ZnS/ZnO shells exhibits better performance than those with ZnS shells. In addition, the photoluminescence intensity of QDs with ZnS/ZnO shells shows a relatively slow decay of 7.1% compared with ZnS shells at 85 degrees C/85% relative humidity aging test for 500 h. These indicate that QDs with different OLA modifications can form ZnS/ZnO shells and have good stability in a harsh environment. The emission wavelength of QDs can be tuned from 505 to 610 nm, suitable for micro-LED display applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据