4.7 Article

Modelling and Optimisation of Laser-Structured Battery Electrodes

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12091574

关键词

battery modelling; laser-structured electrodes; 3D battery concept; lithium-ion battery; multi-physics multi-domain modelling; virtual optimisation

资金

  1. Mobility of the Future programme
  2. Republic of Austria
  3. Federal Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology (BMK)
  4. Austrian Federal Ministry for Climate Action
  5. Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs (BMDW)
  6. Province of Styria
  7. Styrian Business Promotion Agency (SFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An electrochemical multi-scale model framework is proposed for simulating arbitrarily three-dimensional structured electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. The model is parameterized using laser ablation and fitted to four experimentally tested cells. The simulations are performed using finite element implementation in two and three dimensions. The virtually optimized cells can reduce prototyping costs and accelerate the production process.
An electrochemical multi-scale model framework for the simulation of arbitrarily three-dimensional structured electrodes for lithium-ion batteries is presented. For the parameterisation, the electrodes are structured via laser ablation, and the model is fit to four different, experimentally electrochemically tested cells. The parameterised model is used to optimise the parameters of three different pattern designs, namely linear, gridwise, and pinhole geometries. The simulations are performed via a finite element implementation in two and three dimensions. The presented model is well suited to depict the experimental cells, and the virtual optimisation delivers optimal geometrical parameters for different C-rates based on the respective discharge capacities. These virtually optimised cells will help in the reduction of prototyping cost and speed up production process parameterisation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据