4.7 Article

Micro- and Nanofibrillated Cellulose from Annual Plant-Sourced Fibers: Comparison between Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Mechanical Refining

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12091612

关键词

enzymatic hydrolysis; hemp; jute; mechanical pretreatments; nanocellulose; nanofibers; non-wood cellulose; sisal

资金

  1. SpanishMinistry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTQ2017-85654-C2-1-R, CTQ2017-85654-C2-2-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates a technically feasible approach for the production of micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose (MNFC) from jute, sisal, and hemp. Mechanical MNFC exhibited the highest aspect ratio and increasing homogenization cycles resulted in increased viscosity. Shear-thinning behavior was evident for MNFC from jute and sisal.
The current trends in micro-/nanofibers offer a new and unmissable chance for the recovery of cellulose from non-woody crops. This work assesses a technically feasible approach for the production of micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose (MNFC) from jute, sisal and hemp, involving refining and enzymatic hydrolysis as pretreatments. Regarding the latter, only slight enhancements of nanofibrillation, transparency and specific surface area were recorded when increasing the dose of endoglucanases from 80 to 240 mg/kg. This supports the idea that highly ordered cellulose structures near the fiber wall are resistant to hydrolysis and hinder the diffusion of glucanases. Mechanical MNFC displayed the highest aspect ratio, up to 228 for hemp. Increasing the number of homogenization cycles increased the apparent viscosity in most cases, up to 0.14 Pa center dot s at 100 s(-1) (1 wt.% consistency). A shear-thinning behavior, more marked for MNFC from jute and sisal, was evidenced in all cases. We conclude that, since both the raw material and the pretreatment play a major role, the unique characteristics of non-woody MNFC, either mechanical or enzymatically pretreated (low dose), make it worth considering for large-scale processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据