4.7 Article

Enhanced Photocatalytic and Photokilling Activities of Cu-Doped TiO2 Nanoparticles

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12071198

关键词

Cu-doped TiO2; hydrothermal; nanoparticles; photocatalytic; photokilling

资金

  1. Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) [R2565B038]
  2. Naresuan University
  3. TSRI [R2565B038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, metal-doped titanium dioxide was synthesized to improve photocatalytic degradation and antimicrobial activities. The copper-doped TiO2 nanoparticles showed well-maintained anatase phase and a decreased band gap. The 0.1 wt.% Cu-doped TiO2 exhibited enhanced photocatalytic degradation and antibacterial ability, while the high Cu doping levels had negative impacts on surface charge and charge transfer.
In this work, metal-doped titanium dioxide (TiO2) was synthesised with the aim of improving photocatalytic degradation and antimicrobial activities; TiO2 was doped with copper (Cu) ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 wt%. The physical and chemical properties of the Cu-doped TiO2 nanoparticles were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method (BET) and diffuse reflection spectroscopy (DRS). The results revealed that the anatase phase of TiO2 was maintained well in all the Cu-doped TiO2 samples. No significant difference in the particle sizes or the specific surface areas was caused by increasing Cu doping. However, the band gap decreased continuously from 3.20 eV for undoped TiO2 to 3.12 eV for 1.0 wt.% Cu-doped TiO2. In addition, the 0.1 wt.% Cu-doped TiO2 displayed a much greater photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue (MB) and excellent antibacterial ability for Escherichia coli (E. coli) compared to undoped TiO2. On the other hand, the high Cu doping levels had negative impacts on the surface charge of nanoparticles and charge transfer for OH center dot generation, resulting in decreasing MB degradation and E. coli photokilling for 1.0 wt.% Cu-doped TiO2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据