4.7 Article

Study on the Aqueous CdTe Quantum Dots Solar Device Deposited by Blade Coating on Magnesium Zinc Oxide Window Layer

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12091523

关键词

aqueous CdTe quantum dots; solar cell; blade coating; Zn1-xMgxO

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12104402]
  2. Commonweal project of Zhejiang Province [LGC22F050004]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY22A040003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aqueous CdTe quantum dots solar cells were successfully fabricated on the magnesium zinc oxide window layer using the blade coating method. The introduction of CdS interlayer and high temperature annealing significantly improved the conversion efficiency of the device, achieving performance comparable to the conventional devices fabricated with organic CdTe quantum dots.
Aqueous CdTe quantum dots solar cells have been successfully fabricated by the blade coating method on the magnesium zinc oxide (Zn1-xMgxO or ZMO) window layer. Compared with the ZMO mono-window layer, the ZMO/CdS bi-window layer can decrease the interface recombination effectively due to the lower lattice mismatch and fast interdiffusion between CdS and CdTe. Moreover, the high temperature annealing of the CdTe quantum dots absorbed layer passivates the grain boundary of the CdTe crystalline via the replacement reaction of tellurium with sulfur. Finally, the conversion efficiency of our aqueous CdTe quantum dots solar device is improved from 3.21% to 8.06% with the introduction of the CdS interlayer and high temperature CdCl2 annealing. Our aqueous CdTe quantum dots solar devices show a large open circuit voltage and fill factor which are comparable with the conventional devices that are fabricated with organic CdTe quantum dots. We believe that it is the spike-like conduction band alignment between the ZMO and CdTe absorbed layer that reduces the majority carrier concentration, leading to the decrease in interface recombination probability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据