4.7 Article

The Impact of Thermal Radiation on Maxwell Hybrid Nanofluids in the Stagnation Region

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12071109

关键词

stagnation point; Maxwell fluids; hybrid nanofluids; thermal radiation; stability analysis

资金

  1. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia [GUP-2019-034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Building upon previous research, this study formulates a new mathematical model to investigate the stagnation point flow in Maxwell fluid, taking into account the effects of thermal radiation and heat transfer. Using similarity variables and numerical methods, approximate solutions are obtained, revealing the enhancement of heat transfer rate in Maxwell hybrid nanofluids.
Previous research has recognised the study of stagnation point flow by focusing Maxwell nanofluid on a stretching sheet surface. Motivated by this research idea, our main objective is to formulate and analyse a new mathematical model of stagnation point flow in Maxwell fluid that highlights the dual types of fluid known as hybrid nanofluids. The effects of thermal radiation and heat transfer are also considered. The partial differential equations (PDEs) are converted into ordinary differential equations (ODEs) via similarity variables that generate similarity solutions. Following that, the bvp4c approach is employed to discover the approximate solutions of the reduced ODEs. The significance of various parameters is graphically presented and considers the physical quantities of interest. A remarkable observation found in this study is the enhancement of the heat transfer rate in Maxwell hybrid nanofluids, which is steadily amplified in contrast to traditional fluids. Indeed, the Maxwell parameter in hybrid nanofluids embarks on a substantial increment of the heat transfer rate. The current study succeeds in establishing more than one solution along the stretching/shrinking sheet. Thus, the stability analysis is conducted to confirm the sustainability of the solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据