4.3 Article

Prevalence of multiple sclerosis and treatment utilization in a large, highly diverse population

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103784

关键词

Multiple Sclerosis; Demyelinating diseases; Epidemiology; Prevalence; Health services; Healthcare disparities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reports the 7-year prevalence and demographics of multiple sclerosis (MS) and disease modifying therapy (DMT) utilization in a large and diverse population. The study found that MS prevalence is higher in women of all races and ethnicities, and DMT prescription is more common in Hispanic PwMS.
Background: Despite advances in algorithms for identifying people with MS (PwMS) in large data sets, limited data exists on regional prevalence, or prevalence and care in minority populations. Objectives: To report the 7-year (01/01/2012-12/31/2018) prevalence and demographics of MS and disease modifying therapy (DMT) utilization in a large, diverse population.Methods: This retrospective analysis used the OneFlorida Data Trust, which captures health data from >15 million Floridians across 10 constituent organizations. A validated algorithm identified subjects with MS. DMTs were identified using RxNorm concept unique identifiers and National Drug Codes. Results were stratified across age, sex, race-ethnicity, and location.Results: Of 6,638,649 adults in the database, the algorithm identified 9681 PwMS. Overall prevalence per 100,000 was 145.83. MS prevalence was considerable in women of all races and ethnicities ranging from 138.86 to 253.76 per 100,000. 52.6% of PwMS had one or more DMT prescription. DMT prescription was more likely in Hispanic PwMS.Conclusion: Prevalence analysis of the OneFlorida Data Trust revealed a substantial burden of disease in women of all races and ethnicities. Variation in treatment utilization among demographic subgroups underscores the need for additional studies to assess health care disparities in MS at the population level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据