4.3 Review

Acupuncture for multiple sclerosis: A literature review

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103715

关键词

Acupuncture; Multiple sclerosis; Pain; Quality of life; Fatigue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The review suggests that acupuncture can help improve symptoms and reduce relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis. It has positive effects on regulating the neuro-immune system, improving quality of life, reducing fatigue, improving bladder function, reducing spasms and pain, etc.
Background: Acupuncture as a complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) modality appears to be a helpful integrative therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS). Due to the chronicity of the disease and persistent symptoms, a large number of patients seek to use CAM for the MS treatment. Therefore, the present review aimed to determine the effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Methods: PUBMED database was searched for English articles (at least English abstracts) in September 2021, including all articles published since the earliest literature until September 2021. Review articles were searched for relevant data. The searched keywords in titles and abstracts included ((acupuncture) OR (electroacupuncture)) AND (multiple sclerosis). Results: Totally, out of 75 studied articles, 31 were included in this research. The advantages of acupuncture are mainly reflected in regulating neuro-immune system, improving the quality of life, reducing fatigue, improving the bladder function, reducing the spasm and pain of the limbs, delaying the progression of the disease, and reducing relapses. Conclusions: According to the review of the recent articles, traditional Chinese acupuncture and scalp acupuncture appear to help improve the symptoms of multiple sclerosis (including fatigue, neural functional deficits, pain, gait impairments, and bladder dysfunction) and reduce relapses. Therefore, acupuncture could be used as an integrative therapy in patients with MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据